Preise werden täglich über 100+ Shops aktualisiert. Letztes Review: März 2026.

Veazy vs Solo 3 V2 — the direct comparison

Storz & Bickel Veazy or Arizer Solo 3 V2 — which hybrid portable wins?

Two hybrid portables at nearly identical prices, built with completely different philosophies. The Veazy from Storz & Bickel goes all-in on compactness and simplicity. The Solo 3 V2 from Arizer bets on a glass vapor path, swappable batteries, and an OLED display. We compare both head-to-head — data against data.

Specs comparison

Heating: Both hybrid, but different

Both devices use hybrid heating — a mix of conduction and convection. The difference is in the ratio. The Veazy relies more heavily on conduction with convection support. The material heats from below, hot air adds to it when you draw. Works well, especially at medium temperatures.

The Solo 3 V2 runs roughly 80% convection. A zirconium heating element generates hot air that flows through the material in the glass stem. The result: more even extraction, less stirring needed, cleaner flavor. You notice the difference in practice — the Solo 3 V2 delivers more aromatic vapor, especially at lower temps.

Heat-up time: 40 vs. 15 seconds

The Solo 3 V2 wins easily. At 15 seconds, it’s nearly three times faster than the Veazy at 40 seconds. In daily use, this matters. When you want a quick session, you’ll reach for the Solo 3 V2 more often. The Veazy’s 40 seconds aren’t terrible — but 15 seconds genuinely feels instant.

Vapor quality: Glass vs. PEEK

This is where the biggest gap shows up. The Solo 3 V2 routes vapor through borosilicate glass — a material that adds zero flavor. You taste only the herb, nothing else. The XL glass pods hold more material and deliver cool, flavorful vapor.

The Veazy uses a PEEK vapor path. PEEK is food-safe and heat-resistant, but it’s not glass. The flavor is good — Storz & Bickel doesn’t build bad devices. But once you’ve inhaled through glass, you notice the difference. The Solo 3 V2 has the edge here.

Battery: 3,000 vs. 5,000 mAh

The Solo 3 V2 packs nearly double the capacity: 5000 mAh versus 3000 mAh. That translates to 10-14 sessions instead of 6-8 on the Veazy. More importantly: the two 18650 cells in the Solo 3 V2 are swappable. A spare set costs under $10 and instantly doubles your runtime.

The Veazy’s battery is sealed inside. When capacity drops after two or three years, that’s a problem. The Solo 3 V2 can theoretically run forever with fresh cells. For heavy users, this is a real argument.

Controls: Minimal vs. Fully equipped

The Veazy keeps it deliberately simple. Three buttons, three temperature presets, done. If you want more, there’s an optional web app — but there’s no degree-by-degree control on the device itself. The concept fits beginners and people who just want to turn on and start vaping.

The Solo 3 V2 offers an OLED color display with real-time temperature readout, precise control from 50-220 °C, session and on-demand modes, and an automatic display inverter. That’s significantly more control — also useful for experienced users who experiment with different temperatures.

Portability: 134 vs. 210 grams

The Veazy at 134 g is one of the lightest hybrid vaporizers out there. It fits in any pocket and barely stands out. The Solo 3 V2 weighs 210 g — not heavy, but with the protruding glass stem it’s definitely bulkier.

If you’re always on the go and need maximum discretion, take the Veazy. If you mainly vape at home or at fixed locations and occasionally take it along, the Solo 3 V2’s weight won’t bother you.

Water pipe compatibility

Both work. The Solo 3 V2 fits natively into 14mm and 18mm joints with its glass stems — no adapter needed. That’s a major advantage for bong users. The Veazy needs a separate WPA adapter, but works reliably once connected.

Who should buy which?

• Veazy — For anyone who wants maximum compactness and simplicity. Great as a second device, for travel, and for beginners who appreciate the Storz & Bickel name. Solid vapor quality in a device that fits any pocket.
• Solo 3 V2 — For anyone who wants to get the most out of a portable: glass vapor path, swappable batteries, OLED display, on-demand mode. The technically superior device — and at the same price, the better overall package.

Current prices

123
122

Conclusion

At nearly the same price, the Solo 3 V2 gives you objectively more: faster heat-up, a larger swappable battery, glass vapor path, OLED display, and on-demand mode. The Veazy counters with its ultralight design and typical Storz & Bickel build quality — but on specs alone, the Solo 3 V2 leads in almost every category. Unless you specifically need the most compact device possible, the Solo 3 V2 offers more value for your money.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Veazy or Solo 3 V2 better for beginners?

The Veazy is simpler to use — three buttons, zero learning curve. But the Solo 3 V2 isn’t complicated either despite its OLED display and extra options. For beginners investing long-term, the Solo 3 V2 is the better pick thanks to swappable batteries.

Which one has better vapor quality?

The Solo 3 V2. The glass vapor path delivers purer, more flavorful vapor than the PEEK path in the Veazy. The difference is especially noticeable at lower temperatures (170-185 °C).

Can you use both with a water pipe?

Yes. The Solo 3 V2 fits natively into 14mm/18mm joints with its glass stems. The Veazy needs a separate WPA adapter but works well once connected.

How does battery life compare between the Solo 3 V2 and Veazy?

The Solo 3 V2 lasts 10-14 sessions on its 5,000 mAh battery. The Veazy manages 6-8 sessions from 3,000 mAh. Plus: the Solo 3 V2’s 18650 batteries swap out in seconds — effectively unlimited runtime with spares.